Why, Michael J. Fox?
Mr. Fox, first you did the ad for Missouri Claire McCaskill against Senator Talent. Then you did the ad for Ben Cardin against Michael Steele. I'm curious...why these races, Mr. Fox? Wait. Let me guess. All of the "must win" races are going to be showing your shining face in an ad against the GOP candidate, right? Now you are (or were) going to have an ad against Senator George Allen? What does that tell me? You aren't so opposed to right to life candidates, as you are to getting Dumcraps elected, and their sacred cow "abortion" kept alive and well.
I doubt that "embryonic stem cell research" concerns are your true motivation for doing these ads, because you have a foundation dedicated to assisting stem cell research. Are you that ill-informed that you would not have known that Ben Cardin had voted against funding stem cell research?...though it was for a purely political reason! And surely someone at your foundation would have informed you of the lack of viability for treatment involving embryonic stem cells vs. adult stem cells, right? They haven't shown you this report?
That leaves the only one logical reason for your agreement to become a spokesman for Democrats. You are just another Hollywood would-be political hack! Two and four years ago, the Hollyweird star power came out in force for the Donks. It proved to be a failed experiment aimed at young voters. They could have cared less about voting, but boy they loved getting to see all their heroes at the free rallies! Woohoo! This election appeared to have a dearth of Hollyweird opinions (except for the political genius known as Streisand) misleading some to believe y'all learned your lesson. No lessons learned. Just tactical changes, use someone's illness if they also happen to be famous. I'm disappointed in you, Mr. Fox. Very disappointed that you would allow yourself to be so scurrilously used.




I'm with you, Dagney. I used to like Michael Fox but this latest ad of his goes way over the top. It's shameful these people using their disease in this way. That and the fact that he misrepresented the facts.
Reply to this
Isn't he violating McCain-Feingold? Just wondering...because we aren't allowed to have anymore ads at Club For Growth. Hmm...
Reply to this